<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Suddenlink FYI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://suddenlinkfyi.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://suddenlinkfyi.com</link>
	<description>Information for Customers, Communities, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:08:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ESPN Offering Wall-to-Wall NFL Draft Coverage by joeuser99</title>
		<link>http://suddenlinkfyi.com/2012/04/26/espn-offering-wall-to-wall-nfl-draft-coverage/#comment-5199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joeuser99]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suddenlinkfyi.com/?p=14375#comment-5199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlike NFL Network, which had live streaming on iPad straight from their web page, subscribers cannot watch any ESPN network at all on iPad. Hardly &quot;Wall-to-Wall&quot; coverage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike NFL Network, which had live streaming on iPad straight from their web page, subscribers cannot watch any ESPN network at all on iPad. Hardly &#8220;Wall-to-Wall&#8221; coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Any-Room DVR, HD Channels Come to Brenham by Pete</title>
		<link>http://suddenlinkfyi.com/2012/04/20/any-room-dvr-hd-channels-come-to-brenham/#comment-5187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suddenlinkfyi.com/?p=14266#comment-5187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was finally able to confirm that the TiVo boxes deployed in your area have not yet been updated with the required software.  We will make local announcements when that update happens.  Also, in light of this information, I have made appropriate edits to the list of markets (linked in the post above) where the Any Room service is available.  Sorry for any confusion.  We appreciate for your interest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was finally able to confirm that the TiVo boxes deployed in your area have not yet been updated with the required software.  We will make local announcements when that update happens.  Also, in light of this information, I have made appropriate edits to the list of markets (linked in the post above) where the Any Room service is available.  Sorry for any confusion.  We appreciate for your interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Any-Room DVR, HD Channels Come to Brenham by Pete</title>
		<link>http://suddenlinkfyi.com/2012/04/20/any-room-dvr-hd-channels-come-to-brenham/#comment-5174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suddenlinkfyi.com/?p=14266#comment-5174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comment.  I&#039;m checking on the particulars for your area and will respond as soon as I&#039;m able to confirm some information.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment.  I&#8217;m checking on the particulars for your area and will respond as soon as I&#8217;m able to confirm some information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Any-Room DVR, HD Channels Come to Brenham by jjd_87</title>
		<link>http://suddenlinkfyi.com/2012/04/20/any-room-dvr-hd-channels-come-to-brenham/#comment-5173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jjd_87]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suddenlinkfyi.com/?p=14266#comment-5173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a software update required for any room viewing? I live in the Beckley area and still haven&#039;t received the update.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a software update required for any room viewing? I live in the Beckley area and still haven&#8217;t received the update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Any-Room DVR Availability by Pete</title>
		<link>http://suddenlinkfyi.com/2012/03/15/any-room-dvr-availability/#comment-5105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suddenlinkfyi.com/?p=13592#comment-5105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our apologies.  We have now added a brief description of the service to the first paragraph.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our apologies.  We have now added a brief description of the service to the first paragraph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Any-Room DVR Availability by Shane</title>
		<link>http://suddenlinkfyi.com/2012/03/15/any-room-dvr-availability/#comment-5102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suddenlinkfyi.com/?p=13592#comment-5102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is this service?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suddenlink Reaches Agreement with AMC Networks by Rebecca M. McGinley</title>
		<link>http://suddenlinkfyi.com/2012/03/14/suddenlink-reaches-agreement-with-amc-networks/#comment-5100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebecca M. McGinley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suddenlinkfyi.com/?p=13587#comment-5100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t care much for AMC anymore either.Not seeing many &quot;classic movies&quot; there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care much for AMC anymore either.Not seeing many &#8220;classic movies&#8221; there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suddenlink Reaches Agreement with AMC Networks by Rebecca M. McGinley</title>
		<link>http://suddenlinkfyi.com/2012/03/14/suddenlink-reaches-agreement-with-amc-networks/#comment-5099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebecca M. McGinley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suddenlinkfyi.com/?p=13587#comment-5099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How rude!Television and books are the only form of entertainment I have.I have been a faithful customer and have a right to my opinion.Cable has gone up too much already.There was just a rate hike earlier this year.That&#039;s enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How rude!Television and books are the only form of entertainment I have.I have been a faithful customer and have a right to my opinion.Cable has gone up too much already.There was just a rate hike earlier this year.That&#8217;s enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suddenlink Reaches Agreement with AMC Networks by realmendontwhine@hotmail.com</title>
		<link>http://suddenlinkfyi.com/2012/03/14/suddenlink-reaches-agreement-with-amc-networks/#comment-5098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[realmendontwhine@hotmail.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suddenlinkfyi.com/?p=13587#comment-5098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree with most and (mostly) side with AMC on this. Their programming has gotten exponentially better over the last few years and I&#039;m betting they were getting paid an archaic amount for it. I also sure AMC pushed it to the limit to make up for the years a bad, low paying contract they were in. Suddenlink / National Cable Television Cooperative had to give in to their elevated demands now that AMC has desired programing. AMC had just better keep producing quality programming and not cut production costs on their show, like they did last season with the Walking Dead.
With that said though, If my bill goes up anymore I will be dropping cable and going with an alternative service.  If suddenlink wants to save some money get rid of all the worthless &quot;filler&quot; channels that they have or better yet let me subscribe per channel and pay for the ones that I want.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with most and (mostly) side with AMC on this. Their programming has gotten exponentially better over the last few years and I&#8217;m betting they were getting paid an archaic amount for it. I also sure AMC pushed it to the limit to make up for the years a bad, low paying contract they were in. Suddenlink / National Cable Television Cooperative had to give in to their elevated demands now that AMC has desired programing. AMC had just better keep producing quality programming and not cut production costs on their show, like they did last season with the Walking Dead.<br />
With that said though, If my bill goes up anymore I will be dropping cable and going with an alternative service.  If suddenlink wants to save some money get rid of all the worthless &#8220;filler&#8221; channels that they have or better yet let me subscribe per channel and pay for the ones that I want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suddenlink Reaches Agreement with AMC Networks by Josh</title>
		<link>http://suddenlinkfyi.com/2012/03/14/suddenlink-reaches-agreement-with-amc-networks/#comment-5096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 07:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suddenlinkfyi.com/?p=13587#comment-5096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason that there hasn&#039;t been other companies that had a campaign about AMC is mainly due to each individual companies contracts with AMC. All of the contracts have different expiration dates. It just so happens that in this case Suddenlink&#039;s contract has ended before the other cable companies.

Also another thing to keep in mind Suddenlink is a mid-sized operator. They can&#039;t offset some costs like Comcast, Time Warner, DirecTV and Dish can. The companies I mentioned has 15-25 million customers. Suddenlink is in the 1-2 million range.

Also AMC is most likely bundling IFC, WE TV, Sundance along with it and probably wants more money for those channels as well. Unlike AMC its sibling channels are not performing like AMC to justify an increase. 

Now while an increase for just AMC isn&#039;t that bad you have to take in how much does AMC want for its sibling channels. Now here is where consumer bills come into play. 

Remember the Viacom-Time Warner battle? Same thing, Viacom wanted increases for their 19+ channels while only five at the most warranted increases. But another thing to remember despite Bright House Networks also being involved in the dispute Time Warner Cable owns a minority stake in this cable company. Part of Time Warner&#039;s duties for Bright House is to negotiate on their behalf. So technically this was one provider as well.

A lot of broadcast networks and cable channels are starting to lose money mainly due to the rise of streaming media (legal and illegal). Their ratings overall for live broadcasts are down compared to previous years. This also means the money are getting from advertisers are less as well. (Less ratings = less advertising money).

They see that getting cable &amp; satellite companies to pay outrageous prices per subscriber makes up for their lack of advertising money. Companies that have a virtual monopoly like:

*Comcast/NBCUniversal (NBC, USA, SyFy, NBC Sports, Comcast Sports Net)

*The Walt Disney Company (ABC, Disney, ESPN)

*News Corporation (Fox, MyNetworkTV, FX, Various regional sports networks)

*CBS Corporation (CBS, CBS Sports Network, Showtime)

*Viacom through MTV Networks (MTV, Nick, Comedy Central, TV Land) and BET Networks (BET, Centric)

*A+E Networks [jointly owned by Hearst Corporation, Disney &amp; Comcast through NBCUniversal] (A&amp;E, Lifetime)

*Discovery Communications (Discovery, TLC, BBC America [distribution only])

*AMC Networks (AMC, IFC, WE, Sundance)

*Time Warner [not the cable company] (TNT, TBS, Cartoon Network, TruTV, TCM)

*Companies that own local affilates like Sinclar &amp; Hearst Coporation that are affliated with the Big Six Networks (CBS &amp; The CW/Fox &amp; MyNetwork TV/ ABC / NBC)

*National Footbal League (NFL Network/NFL RedZone)

These are the main companies that contribute 99% to the basic lineups of all providers. All of these companies have at some point wanted an outrageous increase or is very popular and wanted outrageous demands. 

If all the cable &amp; satellite companies would have given in at their first offer I honestly believe that our bills (don&#039;t matter if you had cable or satellite) would be 10x more than they are now.

When you see both cable and satellite companies battling the above companies due to their outrageous increases/demands then you know there is a problem when you got DirecTV and Cablevision battling News Corporation.

DirecTV and Cablevision serve the New York market where News Corporation owns the Fox/MyNetworkTV affiliates and threatened to pull not only the cable channels but the local affiliate as well.

I expect that if AMC Networks try this again with another provider like Time Warner Cable or DirecTV you will see another battle. Generally if one provider stands up and speaks out against the outrageous demands they tend not to try it again.

So if Suddenlink happened to drop AMC Networks I would just watch their shows online or go to my relative&#039;s house that has Dish. I wouldn&#039;t cancel my service with Suddenlink over it because they could try this with Dish and then threaten Dish as well. See my News Corporation reference above since this scenario did happen. 

Eventually the owners of the TV channels will break down and reach an agreement on favorable terms. Why? Because even losing Suddenlink (which is 1.5 million subscribers) would hurt their advertising money. So if ratings go down due to a disagreement with a TV provider their advertising money goes down as well.

There is my fifty cents and more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason that there hasn&#8217;t been other companies that had a campaign about AMC is mainly due to each individual companies contracts with AMC. All of the contracts have different expiration dates. It just so happens that in this case Suddenlink&#8217;s contract has ended before the other cable companies.</p>
<p>Also another thing to keep in mind Suddenlink is a mid-sized operator. They can&#8217;t offset some costs like Comcast, Time Warner, DirecTV and Dish can. The companies I mentioned has 15-25 million customers. Suddenlink is in the 1-2 million range.</p>
<p>Also AMC is most likely bundling IFC, WE TV, Sundance along with it and probably wants more money for those channels as well. Unlike AMC its sibling channels are not performing like AMC to justify an increase. </p>
<p>Now while an increase for just AMC isn&#8217;t that bad you have to take in how much does AMC want for its sibling channels. Now here is where consumer bills come into play. </p>
<p>Remember the Viacom-Time Warner battle? Same thing, Viacom wanted increases for their 19+ channels while only five at the most warranted increases. But another thing to remember despite Bright House Networks also being involved in the dispute Time Warner Cable owns a minority stake in this cable company. Part of Time Warner&#8217;s duties for Bright House is to negotiate on their behalf. So technically this was one provider as well.</p>
<p>A lot of broadcast networks and cable channels are starting to lose money mainly due to the rise of streaming media (legal and illegal). Their ratings overall for live broadcasts are down compared to previous years. This also means the money are getting from advertisers are less as well. (Less ratings = less advertising money).</p>
<p>They see that getting cable &amp; satellite companies to pay outrageous prices per subscriber makes up for their lack of advertising money. Companies that have a virtual monopoly like:</p>
<p>*Comcast/NBCUniversal (NBC, USA, SyFy, NBC Sports, Comcast Sports Net)</p>
<p>*The Walt Disney Company (ABC, Disney, ESPN)</p>
<p>*News Corporation (Fox, MyNetworkTV, FX, Various regional sports networks)</p>
<p>*CBS Corporation (CBS, CBS Sports Network, Showtime)</p>
<p>*Viacom through MTV Networks (MTV, Nick, Comedy Central, TV Land) and BET Networks (BET, Centric)</p>
<p>*A+E Networks [jointly owned by Hearst Corporation, Disney &amp; Comcast through NBCUniversal] (A&amp;E, Lifetime)</p>
<p>*Discovery Communications (Discovery, TLC, BBC America [distribution only])</p>
<p>*AMC Networks (AMC, IFC, WE, Sundance)</p>
<p>*Time Warner [not the cable company] (TNT, TBS, Cartoon Network, TruTV, TCM)</p>
<p>*Companies that own local affilates like Sinclar &amp; Hearst Coporation that are affliated with the Big Six Networks (CBS &amp; The CW/Fox &amp; MyNetwork TV/ ABC / NBC)</p>
<p>*National Footbal League (NFL Network/NFL RedZone)</p>
<p>These are the main companies that contribute 99% to the basic lineups of all providers. All of these companies have at some point wanted an outrageous increase or is very popular and wanted outrageous demands. </p>
<p>If all the cable &amp; satellite companies would have given in at their first offer I honestly believe that our bills (don&#8217;t matter if you had cable or satellite) would be 10x more than they are now.</p>
<p>When you see both cable and satellite companies battling the above companies due to their outrageous increases/demands then you know there is a problem when you got DirecTV and Cablevision battling News Corporation.</p>
<p>DirecTV and Cablevision serve the New York market where News Corporation owns the Fox/MyNetworkTV affiliates and threatened to pull not only the cable channels but the local affiliate as well.</p>
<p>I expect that if AMC Networks try this again with another provider like Time Warner Cable or DirecTV you will see another battle. Generally if one provider stands up and speaks out against the outrageous demands they tend not to try it again.</p>
<p>So if Suddenlink happened to drop AMC Networks I would just watch their shows online or go to my relative&#8217;s house that has Dish. I wouldn&#8217;t cancel my service with Suddenlink over it because they could try this with Dish and then threaten Dish as well. See my News Corporation reference above since this scenario did happen. </p>
<p>Eventually the owners of the TV channels will break down and reach an agreement on favorable terms. Why? Because even losing Suddenlink (which is 1.5 million subscribers) would hurt their advertising money. So if ratings go down due to a disagreement with a TV provider their advertising money goes down as well.</p>
<p>There is my fifty cents and more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
